The Attorney General Zbigniew Ziobro filed yesterday with the Supreme Court appeal of the judgment of Appeals Disciplinary Court for Prosecutors at the Attorney General, which finally acquitted Deputy District Prosecutor Puck.
Zbigniew Ziobro brought to set aside the decision under appeal and refer the case back to the appeal to the Court Disciplinary for reconsideration.
the cassation appeal is linked to the thanks to 5-year-old Claudia and 3-year-old Kacper with Puck, who were killed by the foster parents.
According to the Attorney General of the persons responsible for the investigation ignored the alarming condition. – Despite requests made by the police, the witnesses, the experts, the results of the autopsy, prosecutors repeatedly ignored this information, which contributed to a further scenario, which was the murder of Claudia. Does not have my permission to the attitude of the people who work in the prosecutor’s office – said during a press conference on August 3 Zbigniew Ziobro.
Allowing all these shortcomings Deputy District Prosecutor Puck obviously and grossly violated the provisions of the Law on the Prosecutor’s office, the rules of procedure of office of common units of the prosecutor’s office and the Attorney General’s guidelines concerning the management of common units of the prosecutor’s office in dealing with domestic violence. Thus, he is guilty of misconduct referred to in Article. 66 paragraph. 1 of the Act of 20 June 1985 on the public prosecutor’s office (previously applicable) – read on the website of the Ministry of Justice.
Disciplinary Court for Prosecutors at the Attorney General found that the analysis of the evidence in the initial phase of the investigation was inaccurate. Despite the adoption of such an assessment procedure Deputy District Prosecutor Puck Court of First Instance stated that it is impossible to accept that through their actions or lack of them admitted he alleged his obvious and blatant images of the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office, the prosecutor’s regulations and guidelines of the Prosecutor General.
Appellate Disciplinary Court for Prosecutors at the Attorney General does not take into account the complex on this appeal.
The Attorney General did not agree with the verdict of the disciplinary court. In his appeal argued that the Appellate Disciplinary Court for Prosecutors at the Attorney General has committed a flagrant and having a significant impact on the contents of the decision a violation of procedural law (art. 433 par. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Art. 457 par. 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). He failed to make a proper and comprehensive audit of Appeal. Unduly, cursory and briefly considered and responded in a written justification judgment to the pleas raised in the appeal the Disciplinary Commissioner of the Appellate Prosecutor’s Office in Gdansk.
As a result of these violations occurred to uphold unfounded court of first instance. Attorney General stated that it was based on any, contrary to the principles of sound reasoning and indications of knowledge and life experience assessment of the evidence – reported Faculty of Social Communication and Promotion Ministry of Justice.
Source: ms.gov.pl, telewizjarepublika.pl
No comments:
Post a Comment