In the twenty-first century won the election on the Internet? Do not have. Presidential debate in the United States show that television is very good.
the First of a planned presidential debate in the U.S. over the us. Hillary Clinton wiping with Donald trump. Candidate Republican commentators blame the lack of training. In turn, the former Secretary of state was to miss liberty.
the Debate was marked by mutual attacks of the staff. Clinton called trump on the publication of the tax reporting. Last ripostował that will reveal them when kontrkandydatka will be 33 thousand deleted e-mails. As the winner is shown in the media Hillary Clinton. In the online probes, in turn, often wins the trump.
One thing is clear. Monday, the debate is not decided who will be President of the United States.
presidential Debate in the U.S. attract tens of millions of viewers. We are dealing not only with the television show, but also a powerful tool of influence.
According to the results of a survey conducted by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News shows that 34 per cent. the voting was three debates will be very important or important in deciding whom to support in the race for the White House.
the history of the debate shows that the ability to cope in front of a camera and an audience of millions has a huge impact on electoral success. So it was on 26 September 1960, when Richard Nixon was found during the debates with John F. Kennedy.
the Effect was amazing. Well prepared, free and self-confident Senator fell much better than the stressful, tired and worse dressed, Vice-President. Dress, however, was quite an important element of the performance. The video recording of the collision, we can see striking Kennedy and zlewającego with the background of Nixon. Literally, because the expense suits.
In a sense, history repeated itself in 1980, when Jimmy Carter stood in front of Ronald Reagan. What can we see in films up to 36 years? First of all, what Reagan good use of acting skills, to dominate the situation and towered over stłamszonym Carter, of course, yourself. In history, were questions addressed to the voters of Reagan:
“will Do you better than four years ago? Or easier you go and purchase than they were four years ago? Is there unemployment in the country more or less than four years ago. Or America is so well respected in the world four years ago? Do you feel that our security is so assured that we are as strong as four years ago?"
the Discussion was accompanied by a story that came to light only a few years later. The the Reagan campaign come into possession of documents that served the Carter to prepare. In the collective memory, more than she left, however, the famous words of Reagan. “And you with her,” said during a TV meeting with the thirty-ninth President of the United States.
Discussion of Reagan – Carter was a record. Tracked her about 80 million Americans. For comparison, clash of the Nixon – Kennedy watched and listened 65 to 70 million Americans.
harder was the situation after the debate between Barack Obama and Mittem Romney’em in 2012. The result had to be resolved in the third and last match. The columnist for Slate, John Dickerson wrote that Obama won, though the last debate, but Romney may think that he won the war. In the first attack the Republican nominee, of course, defeated the Democrat. “Most would agree: MITT Romney won Sunday’s first debate of the 2012 presidential election,” wrote the Washington Post, which is difficult to blame in favor of the Republicans.
How was it in Poland?
Emotions are also accompanied by the debatom in Polish politics. In the history of media have been clashes Lech Walesa and Alexander Kwasniewski with 12 and 15 November 1995. Few people remember today about any problems, discussed both policies. Most, however, will be associated with Walesa saying that can give Kwaśniewskiemu leg. The second group discussed other known words. “The Lord on Sunday, he came in here, in the barn, and no BAA or me, or Doodle” – claimed by the President to the candidate of social democracy of the Republic of Poland. Walesa lost the discussion, and election.
it is Difficult to say whether the Polish debate have a significant impact on voters ‘ decisions. Looking at this from last year, you sincerely doubt. In may of 2015. in front of the cameras was 10 out of 11 candidates. The then President, Bronislaw Komorowski refused to participate. Viewers remember from that meeting a little. The paradox is that, perhaps, the most striking and impressive figure (though not necessarily najpoważniejszą and the smartest), he was Grzegorz Braun who turned his speech into a political happening. Under his supervision, by the way, hipnotyzującym voice one of their slogans: “Church, school, shooting.”
Discussion skojarzyła, you’re ” with the program “One in ten” and if the whole was maintained, as a festival of political folklore.
it is significant that the Polish debates are often boring, and they arise in politics to insult sztucznością and wystudiowanymi gestures that specialists from the image was drilling into their heads for months. In history there have been exceptions. Najznamienitszym, if unusual, and is present as a “no contest” had a meeting, which occurred at the end pnrm., 30 November 1988. In front of the cameras made when the two leaders of the Soviet. Lech Walesa, representing the Solidarity trade UNION and OPZZ with Alfred Miodowicz. Contrary to the fears of consultants Walesa was done well and surpassed Miodowicza work party nowomową.
I Was 10 when I got in this November evening in front of the TV with my parents. I remember the solemnity of the moment, and is repeated for the next President, the word “pluralism”, which was not understood.
Key aspects of the conflict between the candidates was not as important as the method of the presentation.
this can be Seen in the materials of the brief meeting in front of cameras. Journalists assess the body language, the attitude, the attitude of kontrkandydata. More than words expects expression. More important arguments Shine candidates. This is because through the channels penetrate inside horse plants, specialists from the image, psychologists and sociologists who comment on every detail pozawerbalny debate. Therefore remains an important tool in the campaign television, despite the fact that her disadvantage is the fact that the recipient passively receives the text going off the screen.
Power-Fi flows from the interaction, but by the power of television, is to focus the viewer. It is based on this debate. Watching not bombarded by many stimuli, both in the network and can closely observe the behavior of the candidates and form an opinion about them.
No comments:
Post a Comment