the Commissioner stopped supplying the Polish shipyard, and she was doing things. – says Zbigniew Kuźmiuk.
a Few days ago, a worldwide group of investigative journalists has revealed a number of materials, this time from Paradise tax in the Bahamas, of which, incidentally, implies that EU Commissioner Neelie Croesus, in addition to classes at the European Commission, at the same time led in there by the company.
From these documents follows, that in the period 2000-2009 Croesus was a Director of the company Mint Holdings Limited, although the code of conduct, the EC prohibits national execution of any additional activities.
it is Not clear yet, what did her company, but most often register offshore firms which allow you to send them income and, thus, the prevention or reduction of taxes to be paid in the place where the income received.
it is not known whether in the case of Commissioner of Krez such operations were conducted, but the very fact that for nearly 10 years, led the company from a tax haven and at the same time, she was Commissioner for competition from 2004 to 2010, and in the period of 2010-2014 European Commissioner for digitization, literally dyskwalifikujący.
Neelie Creuse 2014 is no longer his, but that more than 2 terms served in this function for 3 years, through 2017, loads fine. 360 thousand euros of registration, and in connection with the completion of 62 also receives a large pension more than 51 thousand euros per year.
Commissioner Neelie Creuse we remember in Poland, in particular, because in 2009 made a final decision on the need to return through the shipyards in Gdynia and Szczecin, granted to them previously by the government public assistance, the government of Donald Tusk from this decision is not overturned, and both the shipyard declared bankruptcy.
she Arrived, however, then to Poland and met even stoczniowcami but surrounded by bodyguards and police, during which an incredibly hardo defended his decision, not taking neither the economic arguments nor the more social.
of Course, these and not others of its behavior in relation to the Polish shipbuilders influenced the position of the government of Donald Tusk, which in this question is taken, with adequate advance notice, no action in Brussels.
we only Recall that the shipyards in Gdynia and Szczecin has been predetermined already at the time when the European Commission demanded a refund earlier granted to them in state aid, and there was no objection Tusk government against this decision, the expression of which may be appeal to the European Court of Justice.
Donald Tusk, despite the fact that his political career he in a sense stoczniowcom the Coast of Gdansk, when there were problems with the reception in KE programs to restructure the yard, in the circle of his closest associates, he said: “to hell with these shipyards.
Later, when it began the process of their final disposition, in one radio interview, when asked about the success of his government, said that one of them is that it is not dopłacamy already in the yard.
the Tusk Government has adopted the so-called specustawę stoczniową on the basis of which fired in both shipyards more than 8 thousand employees (withdrawal compensation), a company associated with the Platform zarobiły a lot of money on their przekwalifikowaniach (mostly useless), and the property was divided into smaller components and zbyty trade mode.
still at the shipyard in Gdynia and Szczecin, hula wind (only a government of Law and Justice and adopted by the Saeima adopted the law on the restoration industry, shipbuilding), and now it turns out that the Commissioner, who took on the case decision, at the same time violate EU law and supervised a company registered in a tax haven.
” Unfortunately, Yes, it seems the EU reality, we are, however, required in my political group, the ECR (if the allegations are true) that the new head of the EC, at least, deprived the EU of its pension dishonest friend.
Source: cable Republic
No comments:
Post a Comment