Stolen house in the family estate of Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz – TV Republic

Mark Pyza in the weekly “On the Web” got to documents revealing the history of the building, part of which eight years ago in the hands of her husband, President of Warsaw, and before that was stolen to their rightful owners.
                 

Mark Pyza in his article described the history of the property, which posed Oppenheim family and Regirerów. Building owners have died during the war. The building took Leo Kalinowski.

“Kalinowski sells Noakowskiego tenement house at 12 … himself. Other properties – other people. An interesting letter building at number 16 buy Zygmunt Szczechowicz and Roman Kępski. The latter is Uncle Andrew’s Waltz” – writes the author.

The reporter arrived at the information that in the late 40s he found the proper heir to the estate, the widow of the sludge Oppenheimie, who tried to fight for their own.

“Through the so-called . Bierut Decree buildings were nationalized, and thus heirs of Oppenheim and Regirerów they could not continue to demand for their property. As a result, the last owner of the entries mortgage Noakowskiego building at 16 figured Roman Kępski. (…) In 2003,., when no longer Kępski veins, the right to use land for tenement decision coincided with the Office of Real Estate Management Kępskiego heirs, namely, among others, Andrew Waltzowi “- gives the journalist.

Weekly” in the network “recalled one of the earlier posts Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz about the house: “It was a pre-war house of my aunt’s second husband.”

“In the last sentence is contained deep manipulation. According to that the fact that the family had before the war Waltzów a tenement. It is not true either that or the fact allegedly uncle Mr. Andrew became the owner of the building in accordance with the law “- highlighted in the weekly.

Following today’s publication of the weekly” On the Web “Warsaw Mayor issued a statement:

In connection with the article by Mr. Mark dumplings, Fri “…”, which appeared in today’s edition of the weekly across the network (No. 46 (102) 2014, 10-16.11.2014 r.), I would like to clear that the allegations formulated in the article relate to third parties unrelated to me or my family.

The surprising fact is that the sensational newspaper articles relating to real estate at. Noakowskiego 16, published every four years, with the next election for mayor of Warsaw, in which I participate. It’s hard not to get the impression that this issue is a red herring for a substantive discussion about the future of Warsaw and is part of a dirty political struggle.

Proposal for reimbursement of real estate at. Noakowskiego 16, which was nationalized under the decree Bierut, was made many years before my husband had inherited a small portion of the shares to the estate (inheritance proceedings was conducted by the District Court for Warsaw, Prague, Faculty of Civil II and ended in January, 2003).

Do not suppose that in case of any doubts as to the reliability of the available documents and records of the land register of real estate, the officials of the then president of the Capital City Warsaw, Lech Kaczynski, issued a positive decision returns. And just such a decision was issued in August 2003, while the transfer of the management of the property was 3 November 2006.