Journalist TVP has already been instructed by the Law and Justice MEP Zbigniew Kuźmiuk that he should watch TV Father Rydzyk. Especially messages because it is honest journalism and so it should look like news service. – The same honesty should be on national television! – She heard a journalist. So what? Tilted to one side? Dry, dull and passionless? Because Trwam TV news are just that …
“God bless you” – so begins every main news bulletin. And just ends. I think that the words “From the Lord God.” And then always followed by the message: “Again I will meet with you after the Appeal of Jasna Gora.” Since “God bless you” begins with a weather forecast. And here – it can be considered – also begins this journalistic integrity. Free of pigeonholing people, presenting different opinions and points of view. Really, it’s difficult not to notice.
Are defend themselves against deviants?
Oh, if only as a TV Trwam sells news about the homosexual community. In its execution – on deviants. Literally. Such words are falling, such inscriptions appear on the toolbar. December 20. “Is Slovenia defend itself against deviants?” – It’s about a referendum on “these heinous changes in the law,” as we hear in the material. Or 23 of December. This time Greece. “The controversial decisions of the local parliament. Today in the morning the Greek parliament passed a law that strikes the marriage and the family. Fortunately, sexual deviants have not acquired the right to adopt children.”
By the way, some of the recent news TV Trwam can also learn about “the so-called abortion” and “so-called abortion clinics.” Why the “so-called”? Is this shows that if such a standard continues, these “so-called news” we will see more often?
This is a real workshop
That much is the Church, and the relationship with the audience Pope Francis or his deliberations open information should not be surprising. Like the story like this in Canada, with heroic activist proliferators, who spent Christmas in jail. In the end, it’s TV Father Rydzyk.
Let’s look at politics. Law and Justice MEP said after bluntly: “I would advise you to look you Trwam TV news. To see Mr. journalistic workshop. There is the opinion of the government, the opinion of the opposition, shown in a very honest and complete. Separated from this is a comment a journalist”.
We watch. A few days in a row, we look to the archive.
This is the day when parliament passed a media law. In other media is rife in the studio guests, speak to experts. Fakty roar: “Law and Justice raised the temperature and intensified the pace, because the media wanted to have everyone, but not everyone devouring them whole.” Something is happening, the emotion, the material get accurate information about what this law is it, what all this noise.
The opposition also has a voice
A TV presenter Trwam calm, dry voice messages as if reading starts report of the meeting.
“parliament passed a media law. It assumes, among others, expiration of the mandates of the current members of management and supervisory board of Polish Television and Polish Radio. This is the first stage of the reform. The second is to adopt a broad national media law that will change the system of public media “.
Material reporter begins with the words: “Parliament took up the bill at a quarter to midnight. Proposed amendments presented Mr Barbara Bubula “. A large part of the material is devoted just to her. And actually, as we hear, “bizarre situation” when the Deputy Speaker of the Civic Platform deputy took her voice. It takes journalistic inquiry into why this happened.
Yes, there are voices of opposition, though – us emphasize this clearly – mainly from the parliamentary rostrum or meetings with journalists. In the material – as in many others we hear that the opposition wants this or that. That something she did not like it. So you can hear the voice of both parties, no TV Trwam here will not bomb it does not represent the opinion of the opposition. Everything generally polite form. But. Exactly. Something was missing. Experts on the other hand, who could respond to the opinions of experts of this first? Which could, for example, refer to words such an expert?
“first made an unconstitutional selection of judges of the Constitutional Court, then lost the parliamentary elections today at the EU say that this new PiS government is to blame. deputies, because they are talking about, led to a situation in which countries członkowskiee will debate on the internal situation in Poland “.
This is only apparent neutrality
well-known media expert, Prof. Wieslaw Godzic, has no illusions. – In the news formally take care of it to show and back and forth. But only formally. It is the appearance of neutrality. Really you know who here is right. Generally, this is not a satellite today, opposing positions. This is an outstanding one-sidedness – said in an interview naTemat prof. Godzic.
There he applauds, where a man agrees. Almost they did not invite us to study people who think differently than leading. That’s up embarrassing when invited guest is allowed to speak for 10 and 15 minutes without interrupting him. This is the opposite of today that require retort. And there determined who is good, who is bad. And the good out invites, evil does not exist. This is television harming politics.
Can we therefore talk about fairness? – Here you have to relate to specific events. For example, definitely it is estimated that the recent elections showed TV Trwam sided, unreliable, favored a certain group – says media expert.
Yes, in the short relationship appears several anti-government voices from the crowd. But then there are voices of counter-demonstrators. I comment reporter: “Not only that, it turns out that people who came to protest against alleged violations of democracy were paid”. The only evidence that a journalist has won a young man who is waving the flag says: “The people who stand on the other side they pay for. On the web we inserted on this photo, which was a list of payroll.”
Yes touted reliability not allowed to ask the other side? Similarly, as quoted by experts. They asked two and everyone said that democracy in Poland is not threatened. “Banda, which today takes up privileges. Squeal like pigs went to the slaughterhouse, “- says one of them. Where is the voice of the other side?
Information on December 12. • Fig. Screen / TV Trwam
Similarly, the law on police. Supposedly we find out what he thinks both one and the other party, but the material summarizes the only one historian who says, “It is no secret that governments PO-PSL go down in history as a time of increased surveillance of citizens. “And no riposte from the other side.
There is still a general reception of television news Father Rydzyk. Many customers certainly can seem so … unreal. Few modern in the transmission, hardly dynamic, even slowly, without emotion. Like a dry report. “The new law assumes the new law restores, the purpose of the Act is the government wants ….”. I do not see reporters, there are few reports – such real, human history.
No one can impose watch TV
– It is not true that TV Trwam can be compared with TVN24 and show that there is a tilt in a different direction. Nothing of the sort. It is about the general principle. Is there only our right, and all the others do not exist? Do you like the TVN show, however, that there is a so-called truth and untruth. I do not know what will come of this vision. Until I’m afraid that will transform the TV Trwam in public television – he says. But still, he adds, forgetting that the PiS could indeed many in the media do, but one can not.
– You can not order us watching TV. I’m afraid that none of this TV will no longer be seen. People will change to other screens or give up television as the main medium of communication – he says. – I, for example, go to the Internet.
write to the author: catherine .zuchowicz @ natemat.pl
No comments:
Post a Comment