Ws written reasons for the judgment. Pawlicki. “He performed … – Television Republic

Jan Pawlicki, working in television Republic, performing their duties as a journalist. The headquarters of NEC reported the events related to the visit of demonstrators in the above institutions – held court in a written justification acquittal our journalist John Pawlicki allegation of infringement of domestic peace NEC.

On the night of 20 on November 21 during a protest against electoral irregularities in the seat of the National Electoral Commission, the police detained several participants, as well as two journalists and two citizen journalists . Among the journalists performing their duties during a protest NEC was also Jan Pawlicki of Television republic.

During the trial he was acquitted of the charge of “breach of domestic peace” National Electoral Commission. Today there is a written explanation of the verdict of the court.

In a letter to reiterate that both Pawlicki that and the other stopped, photojournalist Polish Press Agency Tomasz Gzell were detained unnecessarily. The court also repeatedly draws attention to the inappropriate actions of the police.

Jan Pawlicki, working in television Republic, performing their duties as a journalist. The headquarters of NEC reported the events related to the visit of demonstrators in the above institutions – said in its ruling. The court also said that journalists from the head office of NEC were led “by force”, which should not happen.

The letter notes that the police Pawlicki identified himself, and yet it has been stopped. It was also noted that TV operator Thomas Orzechowski Republic, as well as being in the NEC with Pawlickim Jeżewska journalist Marta had not been arrested.

Paying attention to allegations of infringement of domestic peace, the court emphasized that: Article act prohibited. 193 K. K. can be committed only by willfully and only the direct intention, and this is due to the use of verbal signs of indicating to the targeted specifically to break the will of the owner (“bursts”, “contrary to the claim (…) does not leave”). In the opinion of the Court the accused did not commit the alleged offense.

The court also admitted that media workers were not obliged to leave the premises of NEC, but “only not to hinder police work.”

Portions of the written reasons for judgment: