Monday, December 22, 2014

The main television news have found that hearing the president … – Press Portal

President Bronislaw Komorowski on Thursday consisted of testimony as a witness in the journalist Wojciech Sumlińskiego and col. Alexander L., a former officer of the Military Information Services, accused of influence-peddling, which were supposed to allow for the verification of WSI. The Presidential Palace, where the hearing was held, accreditation for journalists and TV operators got Poland, TVN, Polsat and Superstacja. TV Republic only received accreditation for the reporter. Although it is the only station that reported the event live. Reporter Michael Rachoń gave live broadcast through the smartphone with the installed application streaming. Other TV gave recorded relationships in information servic es.

– We reported this hearing, but not continuously, since this day has a lot of other things, and it was not the most important event. If anyone thinks otherwise, it apparently is obsessed – says Jacek Rakowiecki, a spokesman for TVP.- showed extensive excerpts from the court sessions were also reports in the news bulletins. Treated the subject with due care and objectivity – says Tomasz Matwiejczuk, a spokesman for the SDP Polsatu.Dla no “to the live broadcast of the interview the first person in the country” is an attitude “from the point of view of the craft of journalism, embarrassing”. Association praises while TV journalist Michael Rachoń Republic for having transmitting interrogation cell phone, “broke the silence to this event and allowed the public to read the testimony of Bronislaw Komorowski.” – It was necessary to show, if only because of the person the president – says the hearing Agnieszk a Romaszewska-Guzy, vice president of the SDP. – Same story related to the verification committee WSI also seems interesting and should intrigue the media. Especially since they did transmissions from such topics as the process we Magda – he adds. – The words of the “conspiracy of silence” are used symbolically, we do not claim that the biggest TV in this case concluded a contract – reserves Agnieszka Romaszewska-Guzy.Bogusław Chrabota, editor-in-chief of “Rzeczpospolita”, watched relationships with hearing Polsat News. – If I had to decide, I would give this transmission, but not at any price – he says. – Rozstrzygnęłoby about the pace of the day and other topics. This was not the end of the event comparable to the landing on the moon – free voice transmission dodaje.- The fact that for the first time, the incumbent president has decided to testify – Wojciech Czuchnowski notes, a journalist of “Gazeta Wyborcza”. – The very thing for the average viewer would not necessarily be interesting, especially that the president does not play a major role in it, is just one of the witnesses. However, if not on the air, the news channels can transmit the testimony of the Internet – says Czuchnowski. – By the way, I would like to point out that the right-wing media used the term “scandal marshal” (Bronislaw Komorowski was then Speaker of the Sejm – ed. Ed.) Is inadequate. It’s a matter of corruption at WSI, due to one of the defendants very sad for the journalist – adds Wojciech Czuchnowski. Although he sees the need for transmission, statements SDP does not support. – Touring SDP lost all credibility for me, after the head of the organization (Krzysztof Skowronski – ed. Ed.) Shoulder to shoulder with the PiS walked in the demonstration on December 13 – selects a journalist, “GW” Piasecki .Konrad RMF FM in the absence of transmission will not sees the problem. – The matter of the hearing was not of paramount importance for the Polish and the world – says Piasecki. – And the media have the right to decide what transmit, and you do a short report. Besides TV republic should be satisfied: had exclusive material – sums Konrad Piasecki. (RUT)

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...