Tuesday, April 7, 2015

What happened on April 10 in Smolensk? We know the excerpts from the book … – Television Republic

The book of German investigative journalist “Secret Files S” appears in German bookstores on April 8. Television Republic today reached the interesting fragments, which have much to contribute to what we already know about the causes of this tragedy.

Even in the prologue to the 19 page book will find a passage on the high probability of the attack on the presidential plane, which has repeatedly said the author. Roth outlines the context, recalling how both the Polish side and Russian soon after the accident as denied, that are responsible for the accident or the Kremlin Russian secret services. “In view of this document should ignore the Federal Intelligence Service (BND)?” – Asks the pages of his book journalist.

“(Document – ed.) Bears the date of March 2014 year. Then the officer sent a telegram to BND headquarters in Pullach, which drew on interviews conducted with a senior member of the Polish government and a leading officer of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). The document is maintained, inter alia, as follows: “A possible explanation for the cause of the crash of TU-154 of 10.04.2010 in Smolensk is highly probable assassination using explosives carried out by the Department of the FSB operating under cover in the Ukrainian Poltava, under General Yuri D. from Moscow “- says Roth.

” The document BND says: “Remaining on the implementation of the course of events, the acquisition of explosives or communication – after making intensive efforts – have failed to explain, because you can not rule out a serious threat to operating on-site sources. “As it happens with all the information the BND, you believe them or not. However, these fit into the puzzle of facts and evidence, which suggests that this intelligence is not fabricated, “- he said.

Jurgen Roth also recalls the words of the late Member of the Bundestag CDU Andreas Schockenhoff, who served as coordinator for the Federal Government. The German-Russian Cooperation Międzyspołecznej “

” At the Munich Conference on Security Policy in February 2013 years said: “We know that there are all sorts of speculation about the causes of and responsibility for the crash of the Polish plane in Smolensk. But it is clear that these speculations can be explained only by the openness and transparency. Moscow’s attitude is incomprehensible. Russians surround the whole thing a secret, which leads to questions about the motives for such action. “This is a statement in February of 2013. 2015 years to the beginning of Russia’s position on this issue has not changed, “- notes.



The assassination ordered” a high-ranking Polish politician “?

The reporter notes that a lot of circumstantial evidence indicates that on board the Tu-124M erupted. Quotes at the BND report in March 2014 which indicates, among others, that the directives of the coup became a leading Polish politician.

“In this document, not only held that the order the assassination of TU-154 came” directly “from a high-ranking Polish politician and was directed to General FSB Yuri D. “Unable to determine when and where it happened.” He then said FSB General made contact with stationed in Poltava operational group under the command of Dmytro S. “Dmytro S. and all of its operational group, which consists of fifteen full-time FSB officers, officially use the documents in Ukraine SBU [Security Service of Ukraine]. Forces remain there as support for the SBU. In fact, they are all FSB officers 3. Department, Scientific and Technical Services. This begs the question, why did you choose 3. Department of the FSB would be involved in such dealings. D. to 2011 he served as an adviser in Kabul Hamid Karzai on. National Security. It seems that D could secure easy access to explosives. Still, given the fact that in the case of TU-154 aircraft in terms of Government of the Polish president with very high security requirements, – according to the author – placing TNT cargo plane equipped with remote detonators would have been impossible without the involvement of Polish forces. “So much for the knowledge BND on the basis of statements of two different sources; representative of the Polish government and the Russian FSB sources. Both sources informed about the case of Smolensk independently of each other, not knowing each other “- you can read in the book.



Tusk – friendly policies of Russia

” It’s at the end of April 2010, German intelligence BND commented on the Smolensk plane crash: “Polish security services are currently exploring the circumstantial evidence in favor of a conscious cause Tupolev crash of Polish President Lech Kaczynski on April 10 near Smolensk. In this context, given the following scenes events. In the second half of 2009, negotiations began between the Polish and Russian energy company Gazprom on a new gas supply contract. “As we learn from the further reading of the report, the Russians put excessive demands so that they were not acceptable to the Polish negotiators. BND drew attention to the expertise Polish Geological Institute, which concluded that Poland may have the biggest in Europe shale gas deposits “Until Further, in order to wean the country from foreign gas for the next hundred years. After publicity in the media content expertise, especially Gazprom, the Russian president demanded urgently sign a contract for the supply and transit of gas … As Polish President Lech Kaczynski has a reputation as a friend of Russia, Putin has put on Donald Tusk and his ruling party, the Civic Platform. Tusk since the election for prime minister was known for a friendly policy of Russia. “How seriously can treat this information? Is it used in all international intelligence circles simple misinformation or we are dealing with a cold analysis of political power structures in Poland for large economic projects? “- We read in the following section.



” Wild speculation or cold calculation? “

The author reflects on the many questions that still remain unanswered. Stresses that there are many theories about the cause of the Smolensk disaster. In this context, refers to German intelligence memo of April 2010:

“At the time of his death, Lech Kaczynski has left a whole range of unsigned amendment of laws and trade agreements. The value of one of these unsigned contracts amounted to more than 50 billion euros, which in the case of Polish security authorities had to raise the question whether the Polish president had to die because of the Russian gas? In August 2009, Putin and Tusk colleagues for the first time to come to an acceptable for “both sides” of the draft contract for the supply of gas, which, however, has been temporarily suspended. Still unexplained reasons. “In another place we read:” The fact that Putin just in Katyn graves drew from his pocket a copy of the contract shoving it under his nose Donald Tusk, is seen by various high officials of the Polish security authorities as a gesture of “insulting and mocking ‘” . The report concludes with the following sentence: “Do not just inside the Polish security authorities is placed next to all of the uncertainties in the death of Lech Kaczynski, the question of just why Donald Tusk in Katyn was offered as an unfavorable contract, and for what purpose he had to accept it?” – Roth says.

Smolensk and shooting down aircraft Malaysian

“The parallels with the Malaysian passenger plane crash of 17 June 2014 are obvious “- Jurgen Roth writes in another passage.

” Depending on the resultant interest, the circumstantial evidence is rated as reliable or unreliable. If state institutions alone are investigating the cause of the accident, political influence is almost always play a decisive role in the investigation. It but differs in Smolensk catastrophe than that which took place in Ukraine four years later. In the case of the Malaysian downing a passenger plane there is an international commission of inquiry, which can operate relatively independently, as in Poland, from the very beginning was ruled out.

The experience gained from Russia, not only in connection with the crash MH 17, show that misinformation is a popular method of covering up the killings and attacks coolies. Political influence, or fear of the consequences seem to be obvious in the case of explaining the presidential disaster in Smolensk machine. Professor Marek Żylicz, member of the Miller put it, with artless candor: “We aim was not to cause a war with the Russians, just to get the maximum information from them to complete this test case.”

The fact is that it is precisely for this reason, the decisive question of the explosion on board the Tupolev 154M remains unexplained to this day. Too much political interests are many and varied, so that you can explain the matter was fairly explosion, regardless of whether it was an attack or not. No doubt a lot of circumstantial evidence supports the fact that the aircraft had come to the explosion. You can not rationally explain hateful because even resistance to these scientists, who have dealt with, inter alia, the issue of presidential explosions on board the machine. This is a phenomenon unique in Europe. But actually there are no obstacles to the credibility of the hypotheses and research results of scientists has been verified in an open discussion “- says.



Supervision crash testing

Roth also draws attention to the factors that led to the fact that the investigation over. crash of the Polish plane with the president on board were in the hands of the Russians.

“Vladimir Putin’s decision to treat the state aviation aircraft with the President of the Republic of Poland on board as a civil aircraft in Russia, the government has given almost exclusive authority over the conduct of the disaster. Thus, the Polish experts and investigators were in their actions completely dependent on the will of Russia, which caused great anxiety Polish security authorities. There was, after all no secret that the Russian government is able to fully take care of their own interests. At this point, it should be recalled BND report from 2010. The document states, among other things, that the official statement, according to which the Polish side trusted the Russian side regarding the investigation into the Smolensk plane crash, was adopted by the Polish critical security organs: “A lot of collaborators security authorities has a deep distrust of the investigation conducted by the Russian side “- says the book Jurgen Roth.


LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...