choosing a new TV a typical customer would usually buy all-rounder, having the most modern and trendy features like 3D and Smart TV, and at the same time not too expensive. Because, contrary to what they preach manufacture, ideal TV does not and will not be commercially available models are forced to make difficult choices, often burdened with a compromise. What does this mean in practice? For example, that if a customer wants to buy a TV with polarizing (passive) 3D, you must be prepared for mediocre at best contrast. Why? Currently available on the market with passive 3D TVs are IPS displays from LG Display. Their advantages include low degradation colors for a bad focus or moving images, but also quite clear black and low contrast.
To better illustrate the problems faced by customers compared with each other two 40-inch TVs in the range of 2000-3000 gold: Panasonic TX-L42ET5E IPS display from LG Display and Toshiba 40TL938 MVA display of Chimei Innolux. Both models have been tested according to the same procedures and the same colorimeter measured. Here are the test results:
Panasonic TX-L42ET5E
price 2600 z?
Benefits
good color reproduction,
highly uniform black (no cloudingu)
good characteristics of brightness, white balance and color temperature
unusually good sharp moving images
flicker-free 3D mode with cheap and comfortable glasses
small reduction in terms of color saturation,
convenient remote control.
Cons
Light Black (0.145 cd/m2),
low contrast (830:1)
low resolution image of the 3D mode,
unattractive sound,
fairly conservative look.
Toshiba 40TL938
price of about 2300 z?
Benefits
deep blacks (0.041 cd/m2),
high contrast (2960:1),
great deinterlacing (deinterlacing)
sharp, and at the same conditions (as in the active system) 3D mode,
small reduction in terms of color saturation,
highly uniform black (no cloudingu).
Cons
incorrect characterization of brightness (even after calibration)
better color reproduction errors than Panasonicu (but without tragedy)
sharp images of moving average,
not convenient remote control,
very attractive sound.
To help readers to choose us look at the table are the most important categories and their winners:
| Black | Toshiba |
| contrast | Toshiba |
| char. Brightness | Panasonic |
| white balance | Panasonic |
| at Color | Panasonic |
| Mapping. Color | Panasonic |
| sharp moving images | Panasonic |
| deinterlacing | Toshiba |
| 3D | Toshiba |
| playback | Panasonic |
| Features of Smart | Panasonic |
| sound | draw |
| look | Toshiba |
| pilot | Panasonic |
| price | Toshiba |
in certain categories (1, 2, 3, 7) dominance of one over the other TV was great. In others, such as 10, was limited to bringing playback TP and have SDHC card slots. In turn, the category 9 (3D) could be a long polemic which is better: a high resolution 3D image in Toshiba, or total lack of flicker in Panasonicu. Since the Toshiba 40TL938 has an exceptionally stable 3D despite the active system, it was awarded the pole position. Watching the storm scene in Ridley Scott’s Prometheus was on Toshiba’s just so much more engaging.
As you can see from the table above, the choice is not obvious. If we pass a subjective category, which is the look, it appears that Toshiba won in five categories, Panasonic 8, and one’s a tie. This means that the decision is not clear, and the final choice will be boiled down to personal preference. And yes, if someone is a priority for blacks, contrast and image resolution in 3D mode, you should choose Toshiba. On the other hand, if you prefer better color reproduction, better focus moving images, niemigocz?ce 3D and smart features rich, then you should choose the Panasonic.
If you still do not fit you, none of the above models, we consider the Sony TVs and the HX750 series’ Samsung Series ES6800/7000. The first offer unrivaled resolution moving images (especially in pulse mode), the second most powerful on the market for smart functions. Anyway, whatever you choose, you will not have everything perfect and ideal for TVs simply do not have.
No comments:
Post a Comment